home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 94 04:05 BST-1
- From: Ofir Gal <ogal@cix.compulink.co.uk>
- Subject: Re: Digest
- To: gem-list@world.std.com
- Message-Id: <memo.480460@cix.compulink.co.uk>
- Precedence: bulk
-
-
-
- In message <Pine.3.87.9406241858.A22568-0100000@grad>, millert@undergrad.csee.usf.edu said:
- >
- >Your arguement is invalid. You complain about programmers having to make
- >changes when keeping Ctrl-A would require MORE changes!
-
- It wouldn't! I'm happy with the way things are. Now, I ask you yet again
- Cut this nonsense and wait for the vote. You are wasting bandwidth and
- time.
-
- >)Can we see an example of this other than endless talk about CTRL+A? I've
- >)seen Edith by Annius and I wouldn't call it lazy programming.
- >
- >I'm sure Edith is a FINE piece of work, although I haven't seen it. I'm
-
- Then have a look at the demo.
-
- >sure it has no (or no BIG) problem with Ctrl-A, but he had to put more
- >work into the code to avoid the problems associated with Ctrl-A.
-
- Can we see and example instead of this endless talk about CTRL+A?
-
- Bye,
-
- Ofir ogal@cix.compulink.co.uk
-
-